The International Energy Agency (IEA) not only provides a roadmap to limit global temperature rise to 1.5°C but also ensures universal access to modern energy by 2030. The decline in oil and gas demand will be steep enough to avoid developing new fields. Key actions include eliminating non-emergency flaring, reducing methane emissions, adopting carbon capture and storage (CCUS), electrifying facilities, and increasing the use of low-emissions hydrogen. Offsets are not necessary, but company commitments to these measures are currently insufficient, with most planning to rely on offsets to reach their targets.

Currently, oil and gas operations account for 15% of global energy-related emissions (5.1 billion tonnes of greenhouse gases). The IEA’s Net Zero Emissions by 2050 Scenario aims to reduce emissions intensity by 50% by the end of the decade, resulting in a 60% reduction in oil and gas emissions by 2030.

Fortunately, the oil and gas industry can address emissions through cost-effective measures such as methane reduction, eliminating non-emergency flaring, electrification, carbon capture, and expanding low-emissions hydrogen use. To achieve a 50% reduction in emissions intensity by 2030, an investment of $600bn is necessary. This represents a fraction of the industry’s windfall income in 2022.

Implementing these measures not only reduces emissions but also leads to additional income streams through the avoidance of gas waste. The upfront spending can be quickly recouped. The incremental cost of oil and gas production would be under $2 per barrel.

However, current commitments from companies are inadequate, with most lagging behind the pace set by the IEA’s scenario and relying on offsets. Forward-thinking companies must move faster than the average reduction rate and encourage others to join their efforts. To gain public confidence, a consistent approach to monitoring, reporting, and verifying emissions is crucial, based on accurate and transparent data.

The post Key Actions For Emission Reduction In Oil And Gas Sector appeared first on Oil&Gas Advancement.

The Rise of Hydrogen Fuel

Hydrogen fuel has recently garnered significant attention, driven by the growing demand for clean energy alternatives independent of fossil fuels. As a zero-emission power source, hydrogen fuel presents an attractive option for various industries.

One reason behind hydrogen fuel’s popularity is its versatility. It can power a wide range of vehicles, including cars, buses, trains, and aeroplanes. Additionally, it plays a role in restoration ecology by helping experts restore damaged ecosystems while minimizing carbon footprints.

Hydrogen fuel cells operate by converting chemical energy into electrical energy via the process of electrolysis. Combining hydrogen with oxygen produces electricity and water as a byproduct, making it an exceptionally eco-friendly solution.

Why Should You Consider Using Hydrogen Fuel in Restoration Ecology?

Hydrogen fuel’s increasing prominence in restoration ecology stems from its numerous benefits. One significant advantage is its emission-free nature, providing an eco-friendly alternative to traditional fossil fuels.

Utilizing hydrogen as an energy source helps reduce reliance on non-renewable resources, paving the way towards a more sustainable future. This shift can have a profound impact on the environment and aid in mitigating climate change.

Another benefit is increased efficiency. Hydrogen-powered vehicles have been found to be significantly more efficient than gasoline or diesel counterparts, requiring less fuel for longer journeys.

Moreover, hydrogen fuel aligns well with remote locations lacking infrastructure, offering clean and reliable energy sources to off-grid communities.

Challenges in Utilizing Hydrogen Fuel for Restoration Ecology

While hydrogen fuel holds promise for the restoration of ecology, several challenges must be addressed. The cost of producing and storing hydrogen fuel remains a significant hurdle. Currently, the production of large quantities of hydrogen using renewable energy sources can be expensive, limiting its usage in restoration efforts.

Furthermore, the lack of infrastructure for large-scale distribution and utilization poses a challenge. Even with reduced production costs, it may not be feasible to transport and store sufficient hydrogen to power heavy machinery and vehicles used in restoration projects.

It is essential to take into account the safety implications associated with storing and transporting highly flammable hydrogen gas. Although advancements have been made in developing safe storage solutions, accidents involving the release of stored hydrogen could have severe consequences.

Additionally, resistance from industries or individuals facing financial losses due to a shift away from traditional fossil fuels may impede adoption.

Hydrogen Fuel in Restoration Ecology: The Future

As technology continues to advance, hydrogen fuel is poised for further growth in restoration ecology. Researchers are consistently devising fresh approaches to produce and harness hydrogen, enhancing its affordability and sustainability for endeavors aimed at ecological restoration.

One potential application lies in fuel cells, converting hydrogen’s chemical energy into electrical energy to power restoration tools and equipment. Hydrogen-powered vehicles, such as trucks and boats, could transport materials and personnel more efficiently than fossil fuel-powered counterparts.

Another advantage is hydrogen fuel’s potential to reduce carbon emissions. Transitioning industries away from fossil fuels to renewable sources like hydrogen could lead to a significant reduction in greenhouse gases contributing to climate change.

Nevertheless, before widespread adoption can occur, challenges must be overcome. A crucial obstacle is the lack of infrastructure for large-scale production and distribution. Investments are necessary to ensure that smaller organizations and communities have access to clean energy sources like hydrogen.

Despite the obstacles, experts maintain a positive outlook on the utilization of hydrogen fuel in ecological restoration endeavors. Continued research and investment in this promising technology may drive significant progress towards a more sustainable future for our planet’s ecosystems.

The post Role of Hydrogen Fuel In The Future of Restoration Ecology appeared first on Oil&Gas Advancement.

Failure to do so would put nations at substantial risk because of a rebound within the Asian markets and also reductions in imports from Russia. The study goes on to find out that the ongoing restrictions on oil and gas sources from Russia could not knock out almost 25 billion cubic metres of supplies.

That said, a refreshed thirst for LNG from countries in Asia may soak up almost 35 bcm, and a much colder winter could very well boost the demand even more.

As per the latest article from Mckinsey, 57% of the EU manufacturers will not be able to reduce their gas consumption further while also maintaining their output for the next couple of years.

This means a further gas rationing measure could also sustainably impact the European Union’s economy. Even if Europe goes on to meet its RePowerEU objectives in order to lessen gas consumption and also enhance energy efficiency, there is a significant amount of risk coming in from probable supply disruptions and volatile gas rates.

Because of this, the consultancy firm predicts that Europe may as well need to elongate the phase-out when it comes to coal, extend the lifetime of nuclear plants, and at the same time speed up the widening of renewable energy sources so as to reduce the dependence on gas as a baseload.

It has also been found that sustained disruptions when it comes to the supply chain, slow permitting of the processes, and a lack of skilled workforce for the installation of renewables could slow down the required pace when it comes to RES development across Europe.

Namit Sharma, one of the senior partners at McKinsey, opines that their analysis does show there is a bandwidth so as to further reduce the gas demand from Europe without having to do substantial damage to its economy. If, in fact, the EU goes on to achieve all its gas savings measures, there could be a 24% reduction in consumption, although probable factors like stiffer competition from Asia could go on to reduce the supply chain of Europe to an even greater extent.

The numerous variables that are at play may also produce a significant amount of uncertainty, and Europe’s businesses may have to be completely prepared to mitigate these risks. This may also require the businesses to consider the diversification factor when it comes to sourcing their energy, as well as managing the demand, precisely monitoring movements within the energy market, and also investing in natural gas substitutes.

The consulting firm has pointed to many actions that can be taken by businesses to enable them to navigate energy market fickleness and disruption. These actions include the procurement of energy as well as energy management, security of supply, management in terms of the risks involved, and monitoring of signs.

According to a senior partner at McKinsey, Thomas Vahlenkamp, if Europe can go on to sustain as well as accelerate numerous reductions in gas measures, the market should remain balanced without going through prominent price increases in the years to come. According to him, Europe can drive demand reduction when it comes to sustainable gas by speeding industrial electrification developments such as fuel switching and through longer lifetime extensions when it comes to nuclear and coal.

The post Europe Must Cut Its Gas Demand Or Face Supply Challenges appeared first on Oil&Gas Advancement.

The vessel is a modern construction support vessel and will provide subsea inspection, maintenance, and repair (IMR), light construction and recycling services to DeepOcean’s customers in the offshore renewables and oil and gas industries.

“Operators of offshore wind farms and oil and gas assets approach DeepOcean because they know we have a 300-strong engineering hub with extensive experience from planning subsea inspection, maintenance and repair operations. The vessels we charter are necessary platforms to execute the work. Adding Olympic Ares to our fleet allows us to further enhance our capacity within this field,” says Øyvind Mikaelsen, CEO of DeepOcean.

The charter contract will commence in the first quarter of 2023 and have a firm hire period until the end of 2024, with option to extend the contract.

Moreover, Olympic will upgrade the vessel’s DP system during 2023. This will optimize DP performance and energy efficiency which enables further reduction of the vessel’s carbon footprint in line with DeepOcean CO2 emission reduction strategy.

“Our target is to reduce our CO2 emissions by 45% by 2030. Reducing emissions from offshore vessels and operations is a key part of this strategy. Collaborating with shipowners such as Olympic Subsea, who operates one of the world’s most modern and flexible fleet of subsea IMR and light construction vessels, enables us to drive down operating expenditure and harmful emissions to air,” adds Øyvind Mikaelsen.

The Olympic Ares will be equipped with 2 x Schilling HD ROVs together with DeepOcean’s dedicated infrastructure.

DeepOcean is a world-leading ocean services provider, enabling energy transition and sustainable use of ocean resources. The company delivers subsea services within oil and gas, removal and recycling of subsea infrastructure, offshore renewables, mining of marine minerals, and to other ocean-based industries.

The post DeepOcean charters offshore support vessel to strengthen customers oil and gas, renewables assets appeared first on Oil&Gas Advancement.

The MicroSeismic DOE project will focus on a turnkey service to create an electromagnetic monitoring network for use during carbon storage/injection operations. The new MicroSeismic CSEM monitoring service, under the brand-name CO2SeQure, will help ensure the safe and compliant operation of industrial scale CO2 storage facilities.

Principally, the CSEM system can efficiently and economically measure the extent of the CO2 brine plume helping to ensure the safe and effective operation of storage facilities, which is critical to the long-term effectiveness of carbon sequestration.

Dr. Peter M. Duncan, CEO & Founder of MicroSeismic said, “Safe and efficient geologic sequestration of CO2 requires monitoring and validation during injection to ensure the integrity of the storage formation and caprock. It is important to safely and efficiently monitor and measure the extent of the CO2 plume so that injection rates can be controlled to prevent leakage from the geological reservoir. With this grant, we will continue developing a turnkey monitoring service using electromagnetic methods that will ensure the safe and efficient operation of industrial scale CO2 storage facilities.”

This is the second grant MicroSeismic has received from the DOE, and MicroSeismic continues to thrive as it repurposes its extensive geophysical expertise in support of a net-zero initiative. The first grant, awarded in 2022, covered modeling, design, and planning for the installation and operation of a passive seismic monitoring service, and this grant serves as a powerful complementary technology to that service.

Through the DOE Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) programs, the federal government enables and encourages small businesses that power the U.S. economy and generate thousands of jobs, both directly and indirectly.

The DOE SBIR/STTR awards seek to transform DOE-supported science and technology breakthroughs into viable turnkey products and services. The awards also support the development of specialized technologies and instruments that aid in scientific discovery.

The post MicroSeismic wins second Department of Energy grant for carbon capture and storage services appeared first on Oil&Gas Advancement.

According to Klaus Mueller, who told the Rheinische Post, they cannot rule out a gas shortage for the coming winter. The risk factors include the fact that the winter of 2023–2024 will be especially cold and that households as well as industries are not saving enough.

Further concerns may arise if Germany’s scheduled liquefied natural gas import infrastructure collapses and neighbouring countries demand supply assistance from Europe’s biggest economy in the future.

So far, Germany has successfully countered Russia’s decision to cut off most of its gas supply to the country, profiting from warm temperatures, decreased demand, and alternative suppliers stepping in.

German gas storage reserves are currently at 63.89%, far beyond crucial criteria that would explain Berlin’s raining down gas consumption, primarily due to unusually warm temperatures in recent months.

Households and businesses, on the other hand, are still being pushed to use less.

The most dangerous factor is the weather. One can’t count on the next winter being similarly mild. Many instantly stop saving when it gets cold. According to Mueller, they saved more than 20% on gas in October last year, but only 7% in December.

The post German Energy Regulator Does Not Dwarf Tough Road Ahead appeared first on Oil&Gas Advancement.

The benchmark European contract, which is the Dutch Title Transfer Facility gas futures, has been trading at $55.81 per MW hour. The futures have already hit a record high of around €343 per MW hour in August 2022.

Europe, which has already been severely affected by the gas cutoff from Russia because of the conflict, has somehow managed to get through the cold season without a significant supply crunch. That said, the structural deficit in European natural gas balances is yet to be resolved and serves an upside risk to gas prices in the region, asserts a major US bank.

As per an investment bank, they don’t expect until 2025 that there will be a sustainable solution to the European energy crisis. That’s when the next wave of global liquified natural gas supply projects that happen to be under construction as of now, shall start coming online.

It is estimated in a report rolled out by the International Energy Agency in 2022 that the EU could fall short by around 27 billion cubic metres of gas in 2023 if in case the deliveries from Russia drop to zero and the Chinese imports of LNG get back to the 2021 levels.

Apparently, countries from Europe have already inked several LNG import deals with the US as well as Gulf countries in the past few months. It was only recently that the UAE and Germany announced the delivery of the first LNG shipment from the former to the latter. Several LNG import agreements have been inked by the European nations with the US and Gulf countries over the past few months.

In November last year, QatarEnergy had inked a couple of sales as well as purchase agreements to deliver 2 million tonnes per year to Germany. Also, the second largest US exporter when it comes to LNG said that the fed regulators had given a go ahead for partial start of commercial activities.

The beginning of this plant, which has the capacity to process almost 2.1 billion cubic feet of natural gas in a day and also export 15mn tonnes of LNG in a year, is anticipated to propel domestic gas prices.

As per the global research and consultancy group WoodMac, resumption of the plant is going to allow the US to be the top LNG exporter in 2023, thereby surpassing Qatar as well as Australia. As per the head of gas and LNG asset research for WoodMac, the need for energy as well as record high prices drove the buyers, including US producers, infrastructure companies, and portfolio players, to look into long-term US LNG agreements last year.

The post Study States European Natural Gas Rates To Multiply By 2024 appeared first on Oil&Gas Advancement.

Apparently, the Russian oil producers have been coerced into offering big discounts on exports, but it seems that the discounts have hurt the government more than the bottom lines of the companies. The changes are going to allow the authorities to set up the two largest direct taxes—the oil export tax and the oil production tax, without linking their rates to the Ural blend, Russia’s main crude blend when it comes to exports.

It is well to be noted that Russia’s tax regulations provide excess profits to the government from the producers when the Ural blend happens to be higher, but at the same time quickly reduce the burden of the tax when the cost dips to $50 a barrel.

The tax rate, which happens to be adjusted at the beginning of every month, is patterned to leave the oil producers enough funds so as to cover the cost of production and also get into some explorations too.

Interestingly, on February 1, the Russian authorities went on to lower the tax on exports by 23%, which came to around $1.75 per barrel. Apparently, the producers were subject to an oil export tax of $8.30 per barrel in the same period last year, as per the Russian Finance Ministry. The Urals price range on average for January 2023 ended at $50 below per barrel against an average of $70 per barrel, a figure that was used to calculate the expected budget revenues for 2023.

As per the ministry, the tax payments from Russia’s oil and gas sector dipped by 46% to an amount of 426 billion rubles, or $6.1 billion, in January 2023 as compared to the same period last year. This was due to a large export market discount that took place on Russian oil. The ministry went on to say that the steep dip in Russia’s gas exports across Europe also contributed to the fall in budget revenues.

The fact is that one of the oil and gas companies’ exports to Europe are taxed at 30% but were estimated at just 25% of the levels prior to the war on routes through Ukraine and Turkey.

Russia’s LNG exports to Europe from another oil producer happen to be exempt from the export tax. That said, the authorities have already disregarded a 34% corporate income tax on the operator right from January 1, compared to a mandatory rate of 20% when it comes to other businesses. One of the senior US Treasury officials who was responding to the decline in Russian oil and gas revenues said that the western price caps were intended to slash revenues that could be used by Russia in its fight against Ukraine and not to break the Russian economy. The decline in revenue has not prevented Russia from issuing more than 1.3 trillion rubles when it comes to new state contracts, which is five times more than what was spent last year in January.

As per the industry analysts, the flow of Russia’s discounted hydrocarbons to Asia shall remain robust, and there are efforts being implemented in order to build a shadow fleet pertaining to old marine tankers to take care of the shipments. According to an estimation done by the US Energy Information Administration, the oil production in Russia will average 9.9 million bpd this year, which is roughly going to be in line with the January output hovering between 9.8 and 9.9 million barrels per day. It is also predicted by the agency that Russia’s oil production will fall in the next few months due to the effect of the EU ban on seaborne petroleum products.

The post Russian Tax Overhaul Looks To Offset Oil Firms Revenue Dip appeared first on Oil&Gas Advancement.

It is well to be noted that methane, which happens to be a key component of natural gas, is almost 84 times more potent than CO2 as far as warming the atmosphere is concerned, but it does not last long before finally breaking down. Researchers have warned that methane outputs must be curbed so as to avoid the worst outcomes of climate change.

One of the recently published studies suggests that the flaring in the oil fields emits almost five times more methane than what was thought before. The entire process doesn’t completely burn methane, and in some instances, flares get extinguished and aren’t reignited, causing the methane to float in the atmosphere.

Although the supplemental proposal would take some pivotal steps to slash pollution caused by routine flaring of gas within the oil wells, there have to be stricter measures to safeguard against this harmful occurrence so as to protect health as well as reduce pollution.

According to lawmakers, alternatives to flaring are available, and that too readily, with states such as Colorado, Alaska, and New Mexico already imposing policies to lessen the pollution due to it. Lawmakers have also gone on to advise the EPA to update and upgrade the rules to define and clarify when flaring can occur during maintenance and emergencies. In the letter, it has been mentioned that the EPA has to build on the leadership of these states and stall routine flaring except for maintenance reasons or any safety measures. Moreover, additional clarifications as well as definitions need to be shared with regards to each of the exceptions.

In November last year, at the UN Climate Change Conference, also known as COP27, an updated proposal to regulate methane from the oil and gas sector was released by the Environmental Protection Agency. The rule, apparently marks for the first time that the federal government would have the existing manufacturing facilities to point and take measures to fix methane leaks. The agency has gone on to say that the updated rule would help curb methane emissions by 87% below 2005 levels from oil and production by the end of this decade.

The post EPA Urged To Keep Methane Emissions From Flares In Check appeared first on Oil&Gas Advancement.

Reuters cited three sources in the Russian oil market, according to which the proposal to reduce exports from Western ports by up to 25% extends beyond the 500,000 bpd output drop anticipated for March.

Despite the reduction in Russian seaborne crude exports being in place, markets were largely unaffected when Russia announced the 500,000 bpd output cut for March. Apparently, western sanctions are driving Moscow to engage in a variety of oil market acrobatics, ranging from output restrictions and the development of new pricing mechanisms for its hallmark Urals crude to enormous discounts to China and India.

Russia’s initial intentions to cut production by 500,000 bpd in March would amount to 5% of Russia’s output or 0.5% of global output. Reducing imports from Western ports reflects Russian crude being diverted to eastern markets, especially India and China, and also possibly Turkey. But the rerouting has run into problems with refined items, which have been sanctioned by the West since February 5th.

It is well to be noted that western sanctions imposed on December 5th and February 5th, as well as the G7 price ceiling, are meant to limit Putin’s access to oil earnings in order to fund his war against Ukraine.

According to US Treasury officials, the decision to restrict output in March reflects Moscow’s inability to sell its usual quantity of oil rather than retaliation.

The post Further Russian Oil Output Cuts Expected In Times To Come appeared first on Oil&Gas Advancement.